Comment: #MuslimBan

My first post of 2017 on this blog … and it’s a sour one.

As an Australian (which therefore must make me automatically qualified to not know a thing about US politics, apparently), this trend today is disheartening news. It’s not disheartening necessarily from a cultural view which most people are getting at on Twitter today – it’s more that we live in a world where our most powerful leaders will willingly reject people and make no consideration for what they COULD provide to a country and our society for the better.

And while the bans seem temporary, its effects are long-lasting. As I read on one person’s Twitter, it’s the end of the “land of the free”.

…which by the way, you guys ended when you elected him in the first place but sure – go ahead.

The most interesting factor that comes as an aside to all of this is that “priority will be given to religious minorities facing persecution” (BBC). And yet – yet – Trump’s example is for Christians in Syria, appropriately worded because the ban would have included seven mostly Muslim nations. Coincidence? I think not.

Put it this way- if this policy was to set a precedent on worldwide refugee dealings, would that make the US deal with Nauru and Manus seem less legitimate? Trump got off the phone with Turnbull (Sydney Morning Herald) and kept the resettlement deal that Obama had made. But many of them are from lands like Syria, Turkey and even closer to home in Indonesia. And is his pragmatism on foreign policy in fact just going to irritate the religious leaders who he singled out for support?

He swore his inauguration promises (legally and policy wise) on the Bible, you know. And now, there is a refugee resettlement SUPPORT letter with more than 2000 religious leaders’ names on it. In it, it writes “This nation has an urgent moral responsibility to receive refugees and asylum seekers who are in dire need of safety.”* Did Trump read this letter? Probably not.

Did Kellyanne Conway, Sean Spicer or even UN Ambassador Nikki Haley even take notice of this letter? Well, they haven’t said anything about it.

Know that this is not a blog post of support or denial of the Muslim Ban or of President Trump in general. However, I will say this. A lot of voters in regional America who thought that a billionaire would help alleviate their pain and protect their jobs are getting duped now. And we the world are left to pick up the scraps – no matter what you say about Trump’s ‘personal’ achievements (cue Dow 20,000 comment here.)

This is going to be a long news cycle year. And I’ll just bet you’ll be back once you’ve read this, to hear more of it from me.

-Hans

To read the letter in full, click here: http://www.interfaithimmigration.org/2000religiousleaderletter/

 

3 Comments

  1. Of course it is not a coincidence Christians are included in the immigration exemptions. The order was written in a way that favoured the minorities in the Islamic countries – which follows suit to the dominance of Christianity in the US, a reason the Bible is still used in the inauguration. It is not surprising at all that Trump has an interest in keeping the Christians in these countries safe but no one else.

    Also, you mention your post is not about your stance or view on the ban or Trump himself. But dumping the blame and fault of this situation on the US population when they “elected him” is hardly fair or constructive, especially given how close the election was. There is still roughly half the voting population unhappy and concerned with the future of the US, if not more. The continuous protests and persistent criticism online is testament to the many that condemn Trump and aren’t the ones to blame for his legislation or executive orders when they weren’t the people that “elected him”.

    Regardless of how he got there, Trump is in. Efforts should be focused to eradicate the abomination of legislature that has come from only a week in office.

    Like

    1. Points are taken. Yes that will be a reminder to me in the future, it is true that the people don’t really elect him – but a college that represents the result of a state at any one time. Glad to hear your views, much appreciated.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s